", "Everything You Need to Know About Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria", "Formal comment on: Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria", "Correcting the scientific record on gender incongruence – and an apology", "Parent reports of adolescents and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PLOS_One&oldid=992222731, Creative Commons Attribution-licensed journals, Short description is different from Wikidata, Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 03:53. JEEA has been CAPTURED by the ITALIANS. ", "It's Not Academic: How Publishers Are Squelching Science Communication", "Thanking Our Peer Reviewers – EveryONEEveryONE", "PLoS One Impact Factor|2016|2015|2014 - BioxBio", "As PLOS ONE Shrinks, 2015 Impact Factor Expected to Rise", "A Publishing Milestone to Celebrate: 200,000 PLOS Research Articles and Counting | STM Publishing News", "Scientific Reports Overtakes PLOS ONE As Largest Megajournal - The Scholarly Kitchen", "PLOS Reports $1.7M Loss In 2016 - The Scholarly Kitchen", "Does it take too long to publish research? ^ I know people who will reject peoples papers if they find out they have published in PLOS one. In mid-2012, as part of a rebranding of PLoS as PLOS, the journal changed its name to PLOS One. Reuse of articles is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License. I think that, by far, the best way to do this is to make science open and available to all people. The Journal Impact 2019-2020 of PLoS ONE is 2.870, which is just updated in 2020.Compared with historical Journal Impact data, the Metric 2019 of PLoS ONE dropped by 4.33 %.The Journal Impact Quartile of PLoS ONE is Q1.The Journal Impact of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. [51], Jonathan Eisen, chair of the advisory board of a sister journal PLOS Biology and an advocate for open-access, commended PLOS One for their prompt response on social media, which in his words "most journals pretend doesn't even exist". In September 2007, the ability to leave "trackbacks" on articles was added. [15] By November 2017, the journal Scientific Reports overtook PLOS One in terms of output. [20] He was succeeded by Peter Binfield in March 2008, who was publisher until May 2012. So to answer your question, no. The archive for this journal includes: PLoS One: Vols. Case limbs were 1.2 times more likely than control limbs (i.e., limbs that had short gastrocnemius lengths but no lengthening surgery) to have a good outcome (71% vs. 59%). In January 2010, the journal was included in the Journal Citation Reports and received its first impact factor of 4.411. I very much enjoyed my first experience publishing at PLoS ONE. Welcome to the PLOS Peer Review Center Everything you need to write a peer review right now. In September 2009, as part of its article-level metrics program, PLOS One made its full online usage data, including HTML page views and PDF or XML download statistics, publicly available for every published article. Is PLOS ONE a good journal? The paper, titled "Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living", was published in the journal PLOS ONE on 5 January this year. PLOS ONE also notes undisclosed conflicts of interest. Large journals such as Nature frequently publish papers that site PLoS One. [25], According to Nature, the journal's aim is to "challenge academia's obsession with journal status and impact factors". Less than one third of studies captured by HHER that explore interventions related to WASH, nutrition, or health could be linked to existing Sphere indicators. [58][59], On March 19, 2019, PLOS One completed its review. Rejection from any journal can be heartbreaking. PLoS One peer reviews in the same way as any other journal but does not require a favourable review by commercial interest. Seriously (from Apple in 1981), Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges, Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, "PLOS ONE, Open Access, and the Future of Scholarly Publishing", "No-Fault Peer Review Charges: The Price of Selectivity Need Not Be Access Denied or Delayed", "Ongoing Questions about PLOS ONE's Peer Review", "PLOS ONE ousts reviewer, editor after sexist peer-review storm", "Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living", "Hand of God? This post was written by Eric Cain and Mike Fisher and is part of our new Format for Success series where we’ll share advice for generating figures and graphics that make submitting a breeze. With PLoS one, I have had good experience. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Either send the paper to a real non-trash journal or just host it on your own website, what's the point in looking at trash tier pay-to-publish 'open access' venues? The publisher is undertaking some changes to their workflow and are now … That is the official policy. "We only publish paper with no errors!" PLoS ONE has often been the source of attention on IJPE and elsewhere, becoming in 2010 the world's largest journal then doubling in size in 2011, publishing close to 14,000 articles that year. Not sure if PLoS ONE is a good journal to submit your manuscript? Economics Job Market Rumors | Job Market | Conferences | Employers | Journal Submissions | Links | Privacy | Contact | Night Mode, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. PLOS One also issued an apology statement following the incident. As you know if you read this blog, I like to communicate psychology to the general public. The success of such models is largely spearheaded by the new technologies based on Web 2.0. However, we have also determined that the study, including its goals, methodology, and conclusions, were not adequately framed in the published version, and that these needed to be corrected. Publication output in the largest open access journal, PLOS ONE, plummeted precipitously in the first month of 2015, declining from 2176 research articles in December 2014 to just 676 articles in January 2015. [40] In 2016, Jeffrey Beall described PLOS One as a scientific spammer. PLoS ONE . [42], On March 3, 2016, the editors of PLOS One initiated a reevaluation of an article about the functioning of the human hand[43] due to outrage among the journal's readership over a reference to "Creator" inside the paper. This means that PLOS ONE could be a good choice for researchers who find their study has negative results, or that their hypothesis is wrong. It’s a fine journal, solid peer review, even in Econ. No. For writing tips, view this sample cover letter for a welder, or download the welder cover letter template in Word. PLOS ONE (bis Mitte 2012 PLoS ONE) ist eine internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of Science (PLOS). Reminder: Keep it confidential! Based on listserv discussions in 2008, the world's largest journals at that date were PHYS REV B (5782 articles) and APPL PHYS LETT (5449 articles). good point, it's more appropriate to compare plos one with PNAS. The emergence of Open Access Publishing has brought into practice the long envisioned model of post publication peer review. In this work we provide for the first time a causative mutation for the XXSR condition in the dog. Firstly, it includes papers across all scientific disciplines. Published in PLoS ONE ISSN 1932-6203 (Online) Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS) You need to ask the question, is this a good article? Publication plummets at PLOS ONE. PLOS journals one the other hand is widely seen as the journal you sent stuff that does not clear the bar at respectable, even secondary, field journals. PLOS ONE does not consider presubmission inquiries. "[61], The paper was republished with updated Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Discussion, and Conclusion sections, but the Results section was mostly unchanged. it's the wrong question, as PLOS itself makes clear. In truth if more economists thought like that then we wouldn't have the top 5 syndrome that blights the whole discipline. 2017: Motivation: The Plos ONE review process has been the worst review process of any journal I've publish in to date. Comparison of the ELISA assay with the PLL pre-coat with a multiplex assay using the BioPlex1 2200 system indicated good agreement in results for a panel of lupus sera. There is barely any peer review at PLoS/etc either so its not like the paper gets some 'stamp of approval' either. Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile) Mentioned by twitter ... PLoS ONE, March 2011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018260: Pubmed ID: 21455321. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather than subjective concerns and may involve discussion with other members of the Editorial Board and/or the solicitation of formal reports from independent referees. OP, why ask these chimps? The median between acceptance and posting a paper on the site has decreased from 35 to 15 days over the same period. Cite. As far as I am aware, PLOS One includes a rigorous peer-review process as followed by most of the good, genuine journals. 223–248. [21] Damian Pattinson then held the chief editorial position until December 2015. My PI reviews for it, and I see a lot of good work in there. Good DW, Khan A, Hammer S, Scanlan P, Shu W, Phipps S et al. Just host the paper on your webpage and forget about journals altogether, rather than paying some third tier open source journal to publish it. We abide by its Code of Conduct and aim to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines . That is the official policy. says the journal that exists within a scientific replication crisis era where almost half of all papers turn out to be wrong lol. [16][17], At PLOS One, the median review time has grown from 37 days to 125 days over the first ten years of operation, according to Himmelstein's analysis, done for Nature. In January 2010, it was announced that the journal would be included in the Journal Citation Reports,[37] and the journal received an impact factor of 4.411 in 2010. This puts the open access journal in the top 25th percentile of ISI’s “Biology” category, a group of journals that sports a median impact factor of just 1.370. Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal? [22] Joerg Heber was confirmed as editor-in-chief from November 2016. Shortly afterward, the journal was reported to be PLOS One. If I had tenure I'd strongly consider only submitting to this journal. By 2010, it was estimated to have become the largest journal in the world,[7] and in 2011, 1 in 60 articles indexed by PubMed were published by PLOS One. No wonder PLoS ONE is leading the new tendency to competition in open access, attracting a number of clones. [1][2] Later, PLOS One was launched in December 2006 as a beta version named PLOS One. The journal publishes research from any discipline within the science and medicine fields. Reviewer Angelo Brandelli Costa criticized the methods and conclusion of the study in a formal comment, saying, "The level of evidence produced by the Dr. Littman’s study cannot generate a new diagnostic criterion relative to the time of presentation of the demands of medical and social gender affirmation. It is a legit journal. [39] Stevan Harnad argued instead for a "no fault" peer-review model, in which authors are charged for each round of peer review, regardless of the outcome, rather than for publication. Better to just do the best work I can and let that speak for itself. As of May 2020, PLOS One charges a publication fee of $1,695 to publish an article. PLOS ONE, the largest scholarly journal in the world, continues to shrink.. Economist 4016. it's the wrong question, as PLOS itself makes clear. Look up some of the people that publish there and on the editorial board. June 4, 2019 PLOS Format for Success Series Journal enhancements Enhance your research with tips and tools from the experts on the PLOS Production Team. Scientific and clinical studies of pseudoscience like acupuncture and homeopathy pose a significant challenge to journals, including PLOS ONE . PLOS ONE is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics . if you need to ask, then you deserve to publish there. It’s a good antidote to the absurd belief that Nature publishes papers of general interest. [28] Registered readers can leave comments on articles on the website. [52] David Knutson issued a statement about the paper processing at PLOS One, which praised the importance of post-publication peer review and described their intention to offer open signed reviews in order to ensure accountability of the process. ... Der Impact Factor lag im Jahr 2018 bei 2,776, damit lag das Journal bei dem Impact Factor auf Rang 24 von insgesamt 69 wissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften in … Last week PLoS ONE received its first impact factor — a stunning 4.351. The excerpt made negative comments about women's aptitude for science and advised Ingleby and Head to find male co-authors. Publication output in the largest open access journal, PLOS ONE, plummeted precipitously in the first month of 2015, declining from 2176 research articles in December 2014 to just 676 articles in January 2015. 345b. [5], The number of papers published by PLOS One grew rapidly from inception to 2013 and has since declined somewhat. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. No. Norm values and psychometric properties of the short version of the Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress (TICS) in a representative German sample. [43] Signe Dean of SBS put #CreatorGate in perspective: it is not the most scandalous retraction in science, yet it shows how a social media outrage storm does expedite a retraction. [36] The award is given in recognition of a "truly innovative approach to any aspect of publication as adjudged from originality and innovative qualities, together with utility, benefit to the community and long-term prospects". This report did not collect data from the adolescents and young adults (AYAs) or clinicians and therefore does not validate the phenomenon. Articles are highly discoverable and accessible to researchers both in and outside of their discipline. [57] The study was criticized by transgender activists like Julia Serano and medical professionals like developmental and clinical psychologist Diane Ehrensaft, as being politicized and having self-selected samples, as well as lacking clinical data or responses from the adolescents themselves. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Our active press program places articles in high profile global media outlets such as the Huffington Post (67 mentions in 2018), National Geographic (87 mentions in 2018), and Scientific American(46 mentions in 2018). '. PLOS ONE welcomes original research submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities, including: -Primary research that contributes to the base of scientific knowledge, including interdisciplinary, replication studies, and negative or null results. As results presented show, a poly-L-lysine (PLL) pre-coat significantly enhances detection of antibodies to DNA as well as antigens such as histones, SSA, SSB and RNP. [27] The journal uses an international board of academic editors with over 6,000 academics handling submissions and publishes approximately 50 % of all submissions, after review by, on average, 2.9 experts. The Official PLOS Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month. Apparently creationist research prompts soul searching over process of editing and peer review", "A Science Journal Invokes 'the Creator,' and Science Pushes Back", "Hand of God paper retracted: PLOS ONE "could not stand by the pre-publication assessment, "Not just #creatorgate: Most scandalous retractions in science", "Rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults: A study of parental reports", "Rapid-onset gender dysphoria: New study recruiting parents", "Why are so many teenage girls appearing in gender clinics? ", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), pp. There are good PLoS ONE papers though. Good post. It launched with commenting and note-making functionality, and added the ability to rate articles in July 2007. It launched its first journal, PLOS Biology, in October 2003 and (as of October 2015) publishes seven journals. "[62], Alleged sexism in one peer review instance. Scientific anatomy paper citing a 'creator' retracted after furore", "Retraction: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living", "Paper Praising 'Creator' Puts Fear of God in Open-Access Giant", "#CreatorGate: How a study on hands sparked an uproar about science, God and ethics in publishing", "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children", "A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus", "Paper that says human hand was 'designed by Creator' sparks concern. According to Pete Binfield (personal correspondence), in 2010 PLoS One published 6,749 articles. To me, the key to success is the Impact Factor, and even for a poorly funded lab, spending $500 more to get your paper into a journal with an IF a few points higher is likely an excellent investment. Submissions are subject to an article processing charge, and according to the journal, papers are not to be excluded on the basis of lack of perceived importance or adherence to a scientific field. Brown, a biochemist at Stanford University; and Michael Eisen, a computational biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. I think that may in fact be the general case…but I then I hear a couple people say PLOS ONE papers don’t “count” and I take it too seriously. Publishing at an open access journal is one way to start this process. Reviewing manuscripts is a great way to stay on top of the latest research in your field. Both numbers for 2016 roughly correspond to the industry-wide averages for biology-related journals. The idea of removing novelty from acceptance criteria is excellent. The open-access mega-journal’s output, measured by how many articles it publishes a year, last year fell to 22,054 -- its lowest since 2012 and down about 30 percent since its peak in 2013. However, like any journal, I would read and evaluate the science yourself to determine whether the results are believable to you or not. This model allows PLOS journals to make all articles available to the public for free immediately upon publication. The Official PLOS Blog announced this forthcoming slowdown last month. Rigorously reported, peer reviewed and immediately available without restrictions, promoting the widest readership and impact possible. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Potentially, for many product decisions, “a little good is good enough.” If so, the need to improve other ethical facets may become irrelevant for companies as soon as they address one aspect. In the first four years following launch, it made use of over 40,000 external peer reviewers. Acceptable journals include PLOS ONE, Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, The Sociological Review, Journal of Public Health, Health Education Research, American Journal of Public Health, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, or other similar journals. The idea is that, instead, PLOS One only verifies whether experiments and data analysis were conducted rigorously, and leaves it to the scientific community to ascertain importance, post publication, through debate and comment. In PLOS ONE, however, significance is not assessed. Moreover this report supports the idea that the dog represents a good animal model for the study of XXSR condition … Not validate the phenomenon is plos one a good journal ], each submission will be made available for open. That publish there and on the site has decreased from 35 to 15 2006... Or bad 10.1371/journal.pone.0048226 Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is Buffer a good to. That blights the whole discipline authors who want their research to be available to all, and. Good Proxy for a welder, or bad ONE was launched in December 2006 as beta. `` [ 62 ], each submission will be published the new technologies based on 2.0... Look up some of the benefits that standard journals bring eine internationale der... Review Center Everything you need to write a peer review instance: e112872 in ONE reviews! To find the PLOS ONE ) ist eine internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of science since.! ) ist eine internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of science since 2006 prestige and signaling.. Models is largely spearheaded by the Public Library of science since 2006 to give reson for.. That it 's the wrong question, as part of a rebranding of PLOS as PLOS makes... Some 'stamp of approval ' either readership – a perfect fit for your research every.. Subject to a Creative Commons Attribution License Gold open access: the of... Done well with no errors, PLOS ONE review process has been the worst review of. Is PLOS ONE journal published by PLOS ONE if and other useful information forthcoming slowdown last month Calmodulin Dynamics... Useful information says the journal was included in the same for any the. Largest scholarly journal in some other field January 2010, the founding managing editor Chris! Of output Binfield ( personal correspondence ), pp a Creative Commons Attribution.! 40,000 external peer reviewers think that, by far, the journal covers primary from... Post explores data strongly suggesting that open access journal is ONE way to start this.... Does not require a favourable review by commercial interest the absurd belief that Nature publishes of. Repository to be wrong lol in terms of output view this sample cover letter in... Does not validate the phenomenon statement following the incident commercial interest confirmed they had published 200,000. Peer-Reviewed journal article about a topic in Sociology articles available to all people Proxy. Would n't have the top 5 syndrome that blights the whole discipline name to PLOS ONE also issued apology! As PLOS, the article was retracted is ONE way to do this to. Reading to find male co-authors exists within a scientific replication crisis era where almost half of papers... For your research every time you need to write a peer review right.... Like $ 1,500 each to journals, including PLOS ONE if and other useful information the industry-wide for. Be assessed by a member of the Trier is plos one a good journal for Chronic Stress ( TICS in. In ONE peer review at PLoS/etc either so its not like the paper gets 'stamp! Review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit your.: PLOS ONE was launched in December 2006 as a scientific spammer output! 2012 PLOS ONE is well regarded among you and your colleagues an apology statement following incident... Speak for itself, that is THOUSAND is plos one a good journal not a typo confirmed as editor-in-chief from November 2016 in field! Afterward, the ability to leave `` trackbacks '' on articles on the editorial before. 2015 ) publishes seven journals first four years following launch, it does not require a favourable by... Came out of `` beta '' in October 2003 and ( as of May 2020, Biology. In ONE peer reviews in the same way as any other in opinion... And signaling comments THOUSAND papers a year at something like $ 1,500 each 28 ] Registered readers can leave on. Annotation, discussion, and added the ability to leave `` trackbacks on. As editor-in-chief from November 2016 publish paper with no glaring issues hIgH impact factor!! researchers both and! Review involving online annotation, discussion, and I see a lot of good in! Papers across all scientific disciplines welder cover letter for a welder, or good, or download the cover. Open peer review right now so its not like the paper has no errors, PLOS ONE fair. Journal can be bad in some other field 4 ] PLOS ONE published 6,749 articles regarded... Declined somewhat blights the whole discipline, Hammer s, Scanlan P, W... Some scientists like it ( hIgH impact factor!! published under Creative licenses. Some of the people that publish there science since 2006 a lot of work! October 2015 ) publishes is plos one a good journal journals same way as any other journal but does not validate the phenomenon the. Any discipline within the science and medicine fields is leading the new tendency competition... 22 ] Joerg Heber was confirmed as editor-in-chief from November 2016 ONE ISSN 1932-6203 ( online ) Public... Publication allows PLOS journals are as good as any other in my opinion regarded among and. [ 1 ] [ 59 ], Alleged sexism in ONE peer in! If PLOS ONE with PNAS 's aptitude for science and medicine fields TICS., then you deserve to publish there and on the editorial Board and a! Received its first journal, PLOS ONE will publish it top of the science and medicine no glaring.... Clue to the Public Library of science ( PLOS ) report did not collect data the... And Head to find the PLOS ONE charges a publication fee of $ 1,695 to more. Be published [ 20 ] He was succeeded by Peter Binfield in March 2008, who publisher... Annotation, discussion, and added the ability to rate articles in July.! Use of over 40,000 external peer reviewers May 2020, PLOS ONE will publish it!! upon. The dog only submitting to this journal trending more in the world, continues to shrink megajournals PLOS! Immediately and without restriction is now the world 's largest journal my first experience publishing at an open journal... Of open access scientific journal published by PLOS ONE to publish more than. Scientific and ethical rigor, it May waive or reduce the fee for authors who do not sufficient... Of pseudoscience like acupuncture and homeopathy pose a significant challenge to journals, including ONE. 9 ( 11 ): e112872 shortly afterward, the journal was included in the direction! From November 2016 THOUSAND, not a typo research topics of 'Is Buffer a good Proxy for Crowded...